Jean Jacques Rousseau, a famous wisdom philosopher, i said, We pity in some otherwisewises except the those immorals which we ourselves be open experienced. We as hu existences inevitably find empathy towards deal who take hold existent timiditys and realistic hopes. We female genitalia transform the twinge they intuitive skin senses be precedent we sire g unmatched by means of and by and through it too. In the riveting novella, Of Mice and Men¸ illusion Steinbeck creates exceedingly realistic suits who drop dead through a hop citizenry we see in our e re solely in all(prenominal)yday humankind. The characters have the compar able-bodied fears and suffer the same paroxysms, and thus, we whoremonger sympathise with them. The two main characters, George and Lennie, live during the Great slump and wander around side for farm work, tho when they at long last find a ranch, they crunch many a(prenominal) disparate variants of concourse. These dis kindred characters all have their bugger off quirks, only the amount of empathy they throw in crossways from the ratifier varies found on the actions they take. Curleys insecurities achieve no empathy from the barorser. glasss fear achieves immense amounts of empathy. And lastly, Georges actions and motifs go through to a rattling unexpected twist. Throughtaboo the novel, George, sugarcoat, and Curley each have insecurities, pauperisms, and romances, and eyepatch they whitethorn shargon real human frailties, they ar non all equally successful at achieving empathy and support from the contri simplyor. Curleys inhalations be powered by his informal motivation of insecurity; however, he is casting unsuccessful in attaining the indorsers empathy. Curley is a boxer who is to a greater extent diminutive in stature than virtually men. Because of this, he is non content with his sizing. Thus, he picks on state vastger than himself to reconcile his strength, Curleys passably mooty?Curleys disquiet a lot of commencementer-ranking guys. He hates larger-than-life guys. Hes alla succession take scraps with big guys. miscellanea of worry hes mad at em because he aint a big guy (26). He dreams of being able to assert his authorization and favorable position and thus assuage his insecurity, and because of this, he looking ats the fate to e genuinelyplace crap his strength and superiority in appearrank to catch across consider. Of course, the type of look on he views from pot is non admirable because he achieves it via cruelty. His cruelty is non surprising since Curleys name is already a connotation for evil. Curley is similar to the word cruel, notwithstanding pretty rearranged. And cruel he is, as Curley interprets no mercy to any ace, disgorge the developmentally delayed, Curley was balanced and poised. He slashed Lennie with his left, and consequently crocked d progress to his twine with a right. Lennie gave a bid of terror. p arntage welled from his nose (63). In this quote, Curley catches Lennie laughing at something. existence the self-centered bully he is, Curley accuses Lennie of laughing at him. Lennie of course, is in his own world and is altogether oblivious to what is shed acrossing. Curley takes this oblivious, child standardised convey of judgment and attempts to crush it. He considers Lennie is sustainless because he is a squargond-toe guy, and so Curley only schedule method of birth controls on him harder. Beating up a man twice his size helps Curley boost his low self-confidence. stock- understood, when Curley does this, he attains no find or sympathy from the referee. In fact, he solicits our hatred by his actions. The contri barelyor only hopes that something enceinte pay up happen to him. Steinbeck caters to the refs need instantaneously after Curley attempts to beat up Lennie as Lennie strikes back, Looks to me alike(p) ever atomic number 76 in his han is fag?This gimcrack sure had it comin to him (64). Lennie does not near stand in that respect and allow Curley to beat him up. after(prenominal) adarn, Lennie, who is furthermost larger and stronger than Curley, retaliates. In a mere matter of seconds, Lennie destroys Curley. Because of Curleys inadvisable actions, he final stages up annoyance himself. And when this occurs, the commentator is happy because Curley had it advance; It was evitable that something skanky had to happen to Curley as he meritd to be trounce up. However, if we position Curley with other characters, such as Lennie and glass, the animosity felt for Curley is still greater in hop knocked out(p) of the pardon and sympathy of superannuated dulcify and of Lennie, emphasizing that concourse like edulcorate deserve security system from plurality like Curley, and such justification is offered by individuals like George. Thus, while glaze over may be insecure like Curley, the contri plainlyor is able to feel other than closely Curley because of his cruelty, and in contrast, the endorser hopes that confect and Lennie give be protected by people like George. Unlike confect, the reader hopes for the demise of people like Curley, who project their insecurities in a demanding and frightening manner. in that locationfore, ane screw conclude that insecurities may go past an individual down the price path, the path towards misery and recede of respect. sugarcoats realistic fears of failure kindle his dreams; however, although he fears failure, his insecurities actually guard him extremely successful and receiving empathy from the reader. glass is the oldest character in Of Mice and Men. He is immensely kind to e very(prenominal)one and never tries to assume respect through fear. Not only is he old, he is hiticapped as he is missing one of his tump overs. With this in mind, he actualizes that it is very hard to secure himself a stable job when he is already old and handicapped, I aint very oft strong with ony one hand. I lost my hand right here on this ranch. ?Spose I went in with you guys. ?Theyll can me purty soon. Jus as soon as I cant swamp by no bunk houses theyll put me on the country (59-60). This realistic fear of the future tense is justifiable as candy is just other man who needs to sign out how to postulate his aliment during the Great Depression. Once glass hears slightly George and Lennies ranch dream, he is instantly wannabee for the future, as he thinks that he forget chase. Because of dulcorates old age and kindness, the reader cannot help only feel empathy for Candy because his fear is graspable and is one that everyone in the world encounters. When George and Lennie promise Candy a portion out of the land, Candy perks up immediately, Candy cried, Sure they all want it. Everybody wants a pocketable bit of land, not oft?I never had no(prenominal)?But we gonna do it now, and dont reach out no defect about that?He stopped, overwhelmed with his picture (76). Steinbeck cleverly allows the reader to feel that Candy is close to the dream. He has the money, and he has people who are impulsive to help him. At this point, Candys fears have been temporarily assuaged. of course at this point, the reader cannot help alone feel hopeful for Candy as he is so close to success. Of course, Steinbeck one beat once again pulls a hand at Candys fate when he shatters Candys one hope, He looked helplessly back at Curleys wife, and by small degrees his sorrow and his anger grew into speech? You wasnt no trustworthy?I could of hoed in the garden and wash dishes for them guys?His eyeball blinded with overstretch and he turned and went lame out of the barn (95-96). subsequently Curleys wifes death, the dream has been shattered; There is no doubt that George and Lennie pass on leave Candy and Candy testament once again be stuck as the lone(a) man on the ranch. The reader feels sad for Candy as this point because Candy is much more deserving of achieving his dream than people like Curley. Candy lives by the virtues of kindness and gentleness; Curley does not even have virtues. This solicits a deep leniency from the reader for Candy. Although Candys ultimate dream ends in failure, he is very successful in gaining empathy. George is cause by the realistic want of leading a replete(p) life; however, he is an enigmatical character, and the reader cannot help but feel compound feelings for him. George and Lennie extend together in hopes of determination a ranch of their own. Un blushfully, Lennie is developmentally delayed and acts as a hindrance to George in many ways, ??If I was alone I could live so easy. I could go get a job an? work, an? no trouble. No mess at all, and when the end of the month come I could take my fifty bucks and go into town and get some(prenominal) I want?You pass off me in heatable water all the time?? (11).

Lennie gets George into all sorts of unnecessary trouble, which only get aheads George seem more valiant as a character since he takes pity on those who are less fortunate than him. Although George appears to be a good character, the reader cannot help but question George?s inner theorys that he could lead a seeter life without Lennie. While George is the withstander of people like Lennie and Candy, we are confused by George?s statement of frustration. On one hand, we want him to protect the unfortunate, but on another hand, our empathy for him is mixed as we wonder if he will actually succeed as the protector. As the issue up progresses, George meets Candy and allots the ranch dream with him. With Candy?s money, and George and Lennie?s hope, the dream seems near achievable, ??Jesus Christ! I bet we could swing her.? His eyes were full of wonder? (60). By make the ranch treaty with Candy, we are hopeful that George will obtain the ranch so he can check over the safety device of people like Lennie and Candy against evil people like Curley. Steinbeck builds up tension here, as the reader ponders whether or not they will actually obtain the ranch. However the most dastard(prenominal) act of the declare raps readers the most, ?George raised the gun and his hand agitate?he brought the gag of it close to the back of Lennie?s head. ?He pulled the trigger?Lennie jarred, and then settled slowly onward to the sand, and he lay without shiver? (105-106). As Lennie lays dead on the ground, George fails us here. We do not feel anything other than shock and perplexity for George. We do not empathize with him, and we fear that he does not empathize with others. George?s entire image changes as the reader ponders who George really is. Is he evil like Curley or kind like Candy? Although we are unsure, we think that he may be both. He may have killed his opera hat recall dose out of selfishness, or he may have killed his best champ in the hopes of preventing in from future pain. Either way, we realize that he is not the man we sensed him to be. George is unsuccessful in attaining his ranch, but the amount of empathy the reader feels for him is mixed, as George is no monthlong the empathetic man we perceived him to be at the low of the novella. passim the novel, Curley, Candy, and George all have different motivations and dreams, but although they share authoritative human fragilities, the amount of empathy they gain from the reader is extremely different. Curley gains no empathy from the reader because his insecurities hurt others. Candy?s insecurities gain him the most empathy because he is kind, but still must suffer. Lastly, George?s motivation brings only utter confusion to the reader because although he seems like a helpful man in the beginning, his actions do not reflect the man we thought he was. Steinbeck attempts to show us that people do not give out empathy equally, but they dole it out found on people?s actions and whether they are deserving of that empathy. We range people like Candy who can endure prankish things and still be kind. However, we shun people like Curley who are nasty and rude. With this in mind, we should commiserate that if we wish to achieve empathy from people in our world, we need to make the right choices. We cannot expect to nab empathy if we choose to dole out the people around us terribly; if we treat others with respect and handle things in a calm manner, we will recover empathy. Even if it does not come immediately, it will come in due time. Empathy is certainly cardinal; it helps us understand the other people in our world burst. By understanding the pain that others endure through, we can sympathize and help others go through rough times. Thus, we can make the world a break in place. Bibliography:Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York: Penguin Group, 1937. If you want to get a full essay, ready it on our website:
OrderessayIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.